ZEC/USDT
0x1ba42e5193dfa8b03d15dd1b86a3113bbbef8eeb / 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955
pairKey 0x1ba42e5193dfa8b03d15dd1b86a3113bbbef8eeb-0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955 · as of 2026-07-23 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: raise_fee_and_incentivize, existing_pair_capture_opportunity, incentivize_liquidity
Recommended action: test higher dynamic fee cap/base + deepen liquidity with emissions/bribes
Reason codes: fees_30d_ge_20k, active_days_ge_24, competitor_fee_ge_25bps, volume_30d_ge_5m, liquidity_ge_500k, momentum_run_rate_ge_0_5, topaz_fee_share_lt_10pct, topaz_volume_share_lt_10pct, major_asset_side
Scored as of 2026-07-23.
Trends (daily, 34d window)
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Hourly data refreshes with the daily collect (~02:15 UTC), so a change from the last ~24h shows pending until the next run brings in its post-change hours.
fees up while share held: fees/hr +57%, vol share +31%, competitor vol/hr -23% over first 72h
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $2 → $4 | +71% | 9% → 13% | +46% | $39.6K → $30.4K | -23% | 5.67 → 8.30 |
| 24h | 24 | $2 → $2 | +10% | 9% → 14% | +54% | $39.6K → $18.7K | -53% | 5.67 → 8.15 |
| 72h | 72 | $2 → $3 | +57% | 9% → 12% | +31% | $39.6K → $30.6K | -23% | 5.67 → 8.48 |
| 7d | 168 | $2 → $3 | +44% | 9% → 13% | +43% | $39.6K → $25.9K | -34% | 5.67 → 8.36 |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → 2% | — | $0 → $21.6K | — | — → 5.72 |
| 7d | 106 | $0 → $1 | — | — → 5% | — | $0 → $26.3K | — | — → 5.75 |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 23 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 23 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 23 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0xbe54…e3e7| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 10:53 | cap 3000→2500, base 500→750 | $42.4K → $76.1K | +79% | $24 → $62 | +159% | 5.69 → 8.21 | 3d vs 22d |
| 2026-06-18 23:13 | K 4000000→2500000, base 750→500 | $0 → $42.4K | — | $0 → $24 | — | — → 5.69 | 0d vs 3d |
| 2026-06-10 18:28 | K 5000000→4000000, base 1000→750 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-06-09 18:46 | cap ?→3000, K ?→5000000, base ?→1000 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
Pools (9)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $0 | $388.8K | $1.59M | $0 | $319 | $1.3K | $16.8K | — | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $1.82M | $3.84M | $8.90M | $5.5K | $11.5K | $26.7K | $623.0K | pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_14d_volume #20, liquidity #22, recent_14d_fees #22, recent_28d_volume #23, recent_28d_fees #26, lifetime_volume #58 | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $1.31M | $2.84M | $5.85M | $3.3K | $7.1K | $14.6K | $392.1K | pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_14d_fees #28, recent_28d_fees #37, recent_14d_volume #127 | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $33.8K | $93.3K | $214.3K | $338 | $933 | $2.1K | $216.5K | pair_scoped_supplement #3 | |
| pancake v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $198.9K | $431.3K | $1.58M | $99 | $216 | $788 | $112.1K | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| uniswap v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $7.7K | $21.9K | $52.5K | $77 | $219 | $525 | $18.0K | pair_scoped_supplement #2, liquidity #133, lifetime_volume #217 | |
| pancake v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| uniswap v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| uniswap v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.